Turkish Right to Information Blog

Monitoring the Implementation and Application of the Turkish law on freedom of information
May 30th, 2008

Watergate scenes in Ankara: Who bugged the CHP?

Turkish press is full of stories about illegal interception of communications of politicians in Turkey as well as news about a new draft Data Protection Bill. I will post further information about these developments too.

Watergate scenes in Ankara: Who bugged the CHP? – Turkish Daily News May 29, 2008: ” It was two weeks ago when the Constitutional Court’s Vice President Osman Paksüt alleged he was being stalked, and yesterday a political party also denounced security officials for eavesdropping on private meetings in the party’s headquarters and providing the illegally acquired information to an Islamic daily, likening it to a Turkish Watergate.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
May 14th, 2008

Britain Opens Archives on UFO Sightings

This is not related to Turkey but nevertheless an interesting news item.

Britain Opens Archives on UFO Sightings: “More than 1,000 reported sightings of unidentified flying objects, heretofore kept locked away in the National Archives, have been released. Of particular interest is a 1984 sighting, made simultaneously by several experienced (and sober) air traffic controllers.


(Via Wired News.)

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
May 8th, 2008

2008 Turkey FOI Report published

BilgiEdinmeHakki.Org Press Release: 08.05.2008

A report prepared by Dr. Yaman Akdeniz entitled Freedom of Information in Turkey: A Critical Assessment of the Implementation and Application of the Right to Information Act 2003 is made available by BilgiEdinmeHakki.Org, a Turkish pressure group on 08 May, 2008.

The report incorporates data and research gathered between 2004-2008, and provides a detailed analysis of the implementation and application of the Right to Information Act in Turkey. High numbers of right to information applications between 2004-2006 (1,886,962 in total) suggest wider awareness of the existence of the law and the availability of a right to information and access to official documents in Turkey.

The report includes an assessment of the work of the Turkish Right to Information Review Council (BEDK) between June 2004 and March 2008 as well as the assessment of the implementation of the law by central and local government agencies. The report further assesses whether the enactment of a freedom of information law in Turkey helped to achieve an open and transparent regulatory process and whether the new law promotes openness and good practice within government institutions in terms of provision of information.

The report highlights both positive and negative observations with regards to the application and implementation of the Right to Information Act and provides a set of recommendations for improvement of the application of the Right to Information Act in Turkey.

The author of the report, Dr. Yaman Akdeniz, stated that “Although the enactment of the Right to Information Act is a very important step towards openness, transparency, and democratisation in Turkey, the report has identified several problems with the application of the law. As the report will show despite Right to Information Review Council decisions and administrative court orders, there is still resistance to give information, and a high number of public authorities are disputing Council decisions, either by ignoring them, or by appealing to administrative courts to challenge such decisions. Therefore, there needs to be significant improvements to the current system to break down the culture of secrecy and resistance to provide information.”

The report is available at http://www.bilgiedinmehakki.org/doc/Turkey_FOI_2008_Report.pdf
For further information see the Turkish Right to Information Blog: http://foia.bilgiedinmehakki.info
Dr. Yaman Akdeniz can be contacted at akdeniz@bilgiedinmehakki.org

Dr. Yaman Akdeniz is a senior lecturer in law at the School of Law, University of Leeds, United Kingdom. Dr. Akdeniz has been following the enactment of the Turkish Right to Information Act 2003 which came into force on 24 April, 2004 since its inception. He has been a freedom of information activist since 1998 and is also the co-founder of the BilgiEdinmeHakki.Org pressure group which monitors the implementation and application of the Turkish law since 2003.

BilgiEdinmeHakki.Org (www.bilgiedinmehakki.org) has been set up as a pressure group on 09 October, 2003, the day the Turkish Government enacted the Right to Information Act 2003 (No: 4982) to ensure that the Act is effectively used by the Turkish citizens and a greater degree of openness and transparency is established in Turkey as part of its democratization. Bilgi Edinme Hakki stands for Right to Information in Turkish, and the name of the organisation is based upon the Turkish Act.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
May 5th, 2008

Workload of the Turkish FOI Council as of March 2008

BilgiEdinmeHakki.Org obtained the following detailed statistics from the Council in March 2008:

  • Total No. appeal applications to the Council between 24/05/2004 – 19/02/2008: 4,042
  • Total Number of Council decisions: 3,539
  • Total number of decision books: 93
  • Number of decision books published: 38
  • Number of unpublished decision books: 55
  • Number of decisions published: 757 (21%)
  • Number of unpublished decisions: 2,782 (79%)
  • No of decisions cleared for publication but not yet published: 0
  • Number of decision books cleared for publication but not yet published: 0
  • Number of applications proceeded: 3,893
  • Number of applications non-processed: 149
  • Total Number of successful appeals: 1,453
  • Total Number of partially successful appeals: 601
  • Total number of rejected appeals: 1,391
  • Total number of appeals in which further review was necessary: 24
  • Total number of appeal applications to be discussed by the Council: 95

As can be seen above, majority of the Council decisions (2,782 (79%)) remain unpublished, an there is no “clear” indication in terms of when these decisions will be published by the Turkish Council (BEDK).

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
May 2nd, 2008

EU hails Turkey free speech move

EU hails Turkey free speech move: “Turkey’s vote to amend a law that limits freedom of speech is welcomed by the EU.”

On the other hand, Council of Europe Secretary General Terry Davis reacted to changes in Turkish Criminal Code related to freedom of expression:

Strasbourg, 02.05.2008 – “The recent amendments to Article 301 of the Turkish penal Code which criminalises insults to the Turkish nation testify to the readiness of the Turkish authorities to review their legislation against the background of their obligations as a member of the Council of Europe and a party to the European Convention on Human Rights. This is to be welcomed. However, although an analysis of the new wording indicates some progress in this respect, it does not alleviate all concerns about excessive restrictions of the freedom of expression, as guaranteed by Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The decisive test of compliance with Council of Europe standards will be the interpretation of the new Article 301 by the Turkish courts, and we will follow the situation very closely.”

(Via BBC News.)

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
April 30th, 2008

World Press Freedom Day 2008: Focus on Access and Empowerment

IFEX

Freedom of information (FOI) laws, which give access to public information, are considered one of the most important pieces of legislation to reduce and eventually beat corruption – the “primary obstacle to development,” says UNESCO.

Despite some problems with poorly crafted laws, laws that aren’t implemented, and new laws promoting secrecy in the global war on terror, upwards of 70 countries around the world have comprehensive freedom of information acts, and another 30 have FOI laws in the works, says ARTICLE 19. And the movement to adopt them is growing: witness Jordan’s step last year to become the first country in the Middle East to have a right to information law, or Liberian citizens marching to Parliament this month to present a draft FOI law nearly four years in the making.

“But the media can only play their part in empowering people, if their consumers have the necessary literacy skills to analyse and question the information they receive,” says UNESCO.

Visit these links:
- IFEX World Press Freedom Day page
- UNESCO World Press Freedom Day 2008 page
- AMARC
- ARTICLE 19, “Freedom of Information: A Comparative Legal Survey
- Privacy International’s Freedom of Information page

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
April 29th, 2008

Information is not necessarily free under the Turkish law

Article 10 of the Right to Information Act 2003 provides that the public authorities may charge the applicants for the cost of the procedure. This is to be added as an income to their budget and the cost would be proportionate to the expenses occurred by the public authorities. It is explained in article 22 of the related Regulations on the Application of the Right to Information Act that the tariff of the cost would be determined by the Ministry of Finance. However, the public institutions are not allowed to demand any cost for the first 10 pages of documents containing the information requested by the applicants as well as the related postal charges. The public institutions are also not allowed to charge for access to documentation in electronic format.

The lack of clarity within the legislation and the related regulations led into some confusion about the cost issue and a decision of the Right to Information Assessment (Review) Council led into an amendment of article 22(1) of the Regulations on the Application of the Right to Information Act in November 2005. It was reaffirmed that there would be no cost on the first 10 pages of documents containing the information requested by the applicants as well as the related postal charges. However, proportionate charges could be applicable for anything beyond 10 pages including for electronic documents if the public authorities had to conduct research, and spend time for copying and reviewing, and compiling the information requested. They can also charge for postage if the documents are sent via post.

The details of the policy were announced in February 2006 when the Ministry of Finance published the tariff and the right to information application charges policy. Subsequently, this policy came into force in March 2006. According to the new policy, there is no obligation to charge, and the public authorities are free to decide whether they would require the applicants to pay for the information requested. However, if the public authorities decide to charge for the right to information requests, they then need to follow the Ministry of Finance policy. The policy clearly establishes that the charges are introduced to recover a proportion of the costs incurred to provide the requested information. The new charges policy was not introduced for the public iauthorities to make a profit, and should, as a matter of policy, not be more than the cost to obtain and gather the information. It is provided that photocopy and printing charges would be 50 Yeni Kuruş (0.5 YTL) per page (both for A4 and A3 size papers) but no charges would be applicable for the first 10 pages of any document.

Additionally, the public authorities may charge for research, reviewing, and compiling, but this should in any case be no more than 5YTL per page (no charges would be applicable for the first 10 pages of any document), and no more than 100YTL in total regardless of the length of the document. The policy also provides that there may be some additional costs if the information requested may not be provided electronically, or on paper. In terms of communication charges, no charges would be applicable for the first 10 pages of any document. However, public authorities may apply relevant postal charges, and 50 Yeni Kuruş (0.5 YTL) per page if the applicants require the documents to be faxed to them.

Finally, and more importantly, the Ministry of Finance policy established that the public authorities will not charge for documents that are provided electronically to the applicants regardless of the length of the documents. However, they may still charge for research, reviewing and compiling.

The application of the Ministry of Finance policy was confirmed in a decision of the Right to Information Assessment (Review) Council in March 2006 with regards to an unreasonable amount asked by an educational authority in Samsun. The Council reminded that the amount of 3,149YTL asked by the authority for research, reviewing, and compiling, was unreasonable and the maximum amount that could be charged in such a scenario was no more than 100YTL subject to no charges would be applicable for the first 10 pages of any document principle as laid down by the Ministry of Finance policy.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
April 26th, 2008

Top board for state secrets to be established

This is the news coverage of the draft State Secrecy Law.

Top board for state secrets to be established

Published in Zaman, 26.04.2008 (Article by Ercan Yavuz)

Agar
Former Democrat Party leader Mehmet Ağar refused to testify to any court or commission about the Susurluk case, citing the principle of “state secrets.”

Public officials will no longer be able to use the “state secret” defense to justify their actions when the state secrets bill is passed and establishes the Higher State Secret Board (DSK) — an ultimate authority for deciding what constitutes classified information and documents.

The state secrets bill, drafted by the Justice Ministry in 2005 but never enacted due to opposition, has finally been submitted to Parliament. It introduces new regulations concerning the concept of state secrets, in the past one of the greatest obstacles in the prosecution of high-ranking public servants.

Aiming to ensure easy access to information, transparency and an end to an unnecessary culture of secrecy in government operations, the bill envisions regulation of the identification, preservation and disclosure of classified information and documents, as well as related duties and liabilities. In addition to redefining the Turkish concept of a state secret, the bill would institute a time limit on the confidentiality of such secrets — a maximum of 75 years. If the bill passes, light may be shed upon a number of scandals that have fallen into obscurity, experts say.

Bekir Bozdağ, deputy chairman of the Justice and Development Party’s (AK Party) parliamentary group, told Today’s Zaman the bill would be passed soon. “Our party is eager to enact it. Recent developments show that such a law is particularly necessary. Due to Parliament’s busy agenda, we were unable to enact it in the previous parliamentary term — but we’re determined to do so this term. I think this will … [happen] soon,” he said.

The DSK will be chaired by the prime minister and charged with determining which documents and pieces of information are state secrets.

The confidentiality provisions of the bilateral and multilateral treaties to which the Turkish Republic is party will be preserved under the new legislation. Information and documents designated as confidential under such treaties will be considered, depending on their nature, to be state secrets or fall under another confidentiality classification.

In the past, debates over agreements between Turkey and other nations have also been affected by state secrets provisions. For example, debate over the price of natural gas sold by Russia to Turkey was stalemated when former Energy Minister Cumhur Ersümer, on trial by the Supreme State Council on corruption charges, said the agreement concluded with the Russians contained a special provision prohibiting disclosure of the pricing. Similarly, defense agreements concluded between Turkey and Israel in the past have been criticized for confidentiality provisions contained therein.

Easier prosecution of bureaucrats

The bill will make the trying of high-ranking bureaucrats easier. In connection with the Susurluk case, which uncovered dark secret relations among public officials, the police and the mafia, former Democrat Party (DP) leader Mehmet Ağar had refused to testify to any court or commission, citing the state secrets concept. Now, the DSK will evaluate Ağar’s definition of state secrets.

Those who violate provisions concerning the preservation of state secrets will be sentenced to from one to four years in prison under Article 258 of the Turkish Penal Code (TCK). Committing the crime through the press, media organizations or the Internet will be considered an aggravated circumstance.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
April 25th, 2008

Summary of the Draft Turkish State Secrecy Law

A new draft law on state secrecy was announced in January 2008, and made public on 24 April, 2008. This new draft law on State Secrecy was sent from the Prime Ministry to the Parliament for discussion.

State Secrecy Council & State Secrecy High Council

If enacted will introduce a State Secrecy Council as well as a State Secrecy High Council. The former which will be formed by the Permanent Undersecretary for the Prime Minister, and will include as its members the permanent undersecretaries for the Prime Ministry, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, will make the secrecy decisions. On the other hand, the State Secrecy High Council will include as its members the Prime Minister, and the ministers for the Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Defence and Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Prime Minister will act as the president for the State Secrecy High Council. Therefore, there is no provision for an independent oversight body within the proposed system. The State Secrecy High Council would provide its opinion with regards to court action involving state secret classified documents.

Definition of state secrets and classified information

In terms of what constitutes a “state secret”, documents the disclosure of which would seriously undermine and damage national security, the territorial and constitutional integrity of Turkey, or its foreign relations, would be classified as state secrets by the State Secrecy Council. The draft law also provides that certain documents could be protected as “classified information” by the State Secrecy Council and these would be documents the disclosure of which would seriously undermine the economic well-being of the state, state intelligence, military service, documents pertaining the administrative and judicial investigations and prosecutions, as well as documents which were classified as “secret” or “classified” by relevant authorities. The Prime Minister, the Chief of General Staff, State Ministers, and the National Security Council can ask the State Secrecy Council to issue classify documents that relate to their business as state secrets. Other public authorities can only ask the Council to classify documents as state secrets through the Ministries that they are connected to. According to the proposed law, the President of Turkey himself decides the nature and classification of secrecy with regards to the documents he holds.

Duration

In terms of duration, the proposed law enables time limited classifications as well as indefinite classifications. A maximum period of 75 years is provided by law with regards to time based classifications. The State Secrecy Council can modify the time period on such classified documents, or can de-classify such documents. Indefinitely classified documents are subject to review every 10 years. Classified documents which are classified for more than 10 years are subject to review every 5 years. Indefinitely classified state secrets would automatically cease to be state secrets after 50 years unless the State Secrecy Council decides to the contrary. In terms of the duration of other “classified information” these are limited by half of the time period specified for state secrets.

Criminal Sanctions for disclosure

The proposed law refers to section 258 of the Turkish Criminal Code and reminds that those who publish state secrets would be committing a criminal offence punishable between one to 4 years of imprisonment. However, if the publication and dissemination takes place through the media, or through the Internet, such actions would be seen as an aggravating factor and the penalty would be increased by 50%.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
April 24th, 2008

State Secrecy Council, and Draft State Secrets law announced

The Government today announced the long awaited draft state secrey law which will introduce a State Secrecy Council with regards to official documents containing state secrets. I have the draft law in Turkish and will provide a summary as soon as I digest it. The government also announced another long awaited draft law on data protection. Sadly, no one noticed and this has not hit the news today.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati